Inquiring minds want to know

If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?

neither. you've just wasted time.

Are you sure its not both? For you have SUCEEDED in FAILING

It all really depends whether or not you really wanted to succeed or not. If you did, then you did something good. If you really wanted to fail, and you actually succeeded for the better, than that's good too. If you wanted to fail, and you made the situation worse by succeeding, then that sucks, doesen't it?

i understand but... you still havent answered my question

This really is a complete waste oftime which in itself is a faliure

cheers

You've failed. And Thor was right, you wasted time. "succeeding" at failing is an invalid definition of success.

This is all confusing me. I think I will go have some coffee.

And technically, you've succeeded. But you, in fact, failed, because you didn't get what you wanted in the end.

And I love coffee.

i don't know, man...if you succeed to fail you've also failed to succeed. So, in itself, it's really just a balance of opposite forces, like yin and yang.

...and yes, a waste of time.


...ick, coffee

so in this line of thinking if you try to fail, and fail, does this mean youve succeeded? and if youve succeeded then you didnt fail so its a paradox, and will tear the universe apart (bttf reference) but if a physical paradox existed what would happen?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by I_Like_Rice
[B]so in this line of thinking if you try to fail, and fail, does this mean youve succeeded? and if youve succeeded then you didnt fail so its a paradox, and will tear the universe apart (bttf reference) but if a physical paradox existed what would happen?







Maybe you should lay off the rice for a while.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by sarah goode
[B]

yeah, really...


...and btw, what inquiring minds wanted to know this, exactly?