![]() | | |
|
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Are you sure everyone says that? I have never said any such thing, but I am after all only one person, which puts the kybosh to the universal set of "everyone" saying such a thing. I would disagree anyhow with that comment about Animals and TDB. It's all subjective. Floyd on! Byron |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Maybe it's more down to the production, more than anything.... |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| If that's supposed to be a negative comment, then I'm afraid I have no understanding of it. Especially not with TDB, which is one of my three top favourite Floyd albums (three which tied for first). |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| It's not meant to be negative. It's a suggestive observation. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Maybe not "everyone" but my point is that people have refered to TDB and Animals as being "brother" albums and i was having a hard time understanding why...not to be negative...they're both great albums...i'm just wondering why people would go as far as to say they are "brothers" |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I could go off on a shpeeeeel about how TDB doesn't even remotely compare to my favorite album but I won't. I would be interested to know who says this and what their reasoning is. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I wouldn't go so far as to call them "brother" albums...but maybe it has something to do with how the concept is a little "looser" than some of the other albums like The Wall or The Final Cut. More like a themed album rather than a concept album. That does NOT mean I don't enjoy Animals, though! |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm not too sure about that, as Animals does have a concept, the whole animal thing. The Division Bell doesn't have as much of one, but Animals does. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| This whole concept of 'em being brother albums is like "no way" man!! Who ever thought of such a thing. I would dare say that about the only thing I found nice on TDB was the guitar solo end for High Hopes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Well...i was reading through some of the other forums, and there was a conversation about how Animals and Division Bell were meant to be listened to together, because they were supposed to be "brother" albums...i was trying to find out what they meant... |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| I never thought about these albums in this way. For me they are absolutely different. A. has a concept, TDB doesn't, A. is depressive TDB is not, A. has more to do with lyrics, and A. doesn't have High Hopes ) |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| actually i would think you'd have to say that the division bell does have a concept. its all about communication. especially cluster one. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| ...and the lack of. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| about the mis-communication i'd say. but i don't believe Dave can write a concept album LOL but anyway i think A. has MORE concept inside. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| the division bell, animals album, delicate sound of thunder album |
| Thread Tools | |
| |