Come on!

I'd like to see it too, but in their late 50's, i dont know if theyd like to go through the hassle of another album.

It would be so nice...

...if it could be done in a civil manner. With the way that Mr. Wright got treated when he went to see Mr. Waters backstage in 1999, I don't see it happening. (What do I mean by that? You know the drinking comment? I've got a sneaking suspicion, thanks to some outside accounts that I've read of that concert, that it's a lie on Mr. Waters' part!)

__________________
"And with these words I can see
Clear through the clouds that covered me
Just give it time then speak my name
Now we can hear ourselves again..."

WrightSatellite #1

and what happened when wright went backstage to see waters? i haven't heard that story.
and about the question : i think that it would be best for them not to make any more albums, because they'll never reach the perfection of their earlier work, and they are, i think, now too old for something revolutionary good. i don't think that anyone needs an average pink floyd album. or does he ?

__________________
Something stares and something tries and
Starts to climb toward the light...

Dogs, it is a theory I have regarding the 1999 MOJO article ("Danger! Band imploding" or something like that.). I have two different accounts that tell me something very different from that article...if I can get a third source, then I might give it even more weight.

As it is now, this is a theory that has not yet been proven conclusively (thus I will not post it here), but there is enough evidence that I put it forth as a THEORY on my website. Click on the WWW button at the bottom of my post, then click on "Richard Wright." Read the FloydWaters Commentary to see what I'm talking about...

__________________
"And with these words I can see
Clear through the clouds that covered me
Just give it time then speak my name
Now we can hear ourselves again..."

WrightSatellite #1

I'd like to see a reunion TOUR, ASAP!
But for some reason I doubt that it's ever going to happen

__________________
Spellinng mistaces are a federale offence, yu wil be baned if you are kought makeing eny.

I think a new Gilmour/Waters/Wright/Mason album would rule. Shake music to its foundations. That is, if they could actually finish it without killing each other.

__________________
what do you teach your children about me?
what do you teach your little children about me?
pimp, thug, bling drug lord of the undergrounded kings
how can you be so sure i won't call down the rain?
what do you teach your little children about me?
you point your gun, wait, hide and run. i see it plain

i think that if they all got together and got an album out , it should be like the wall or darkside of the moon , with a theme (duh they all do) , like a story , and that would make it a very good album . especially if it was like the wall, with lots of songs ,instead of just like 5 like animals and wywh. so what ever , but hopefully they will get together , atleast just roger and dave ,(no affence by those who really like mason and wright , or to them themselves)

__________________
"What do you mean, 'I hurt your feelings'?
I didn't know you had any feelings.
What do you mean, 'I ain't kind'?
Just not your kind.
What do you mean, 'I couldn't be the President
Of the United States of America'?
Tell me something, it's still 'We the people,' right?"

None taken

__________________
Spellinng mistaces are a federale offence, yu wil be baned if you are kought makeing eny.

wouldn't need them anyway, eh?

And while you're at it, you can wish for Syd to come back, also.

And what's wrong with the fact that WYWH and Animals have only five tracks/songs each? Does having more tracks/songs make an album better?

well thats good



well i think to actually get an album out that atleast sounded something like there earlyer albums when they had rog in there , they would have to have those to , , but my opinion



well i like it when they do (but i guess that doesn't mean that u do to , but i didnt say that soooo) and i like wywh , how they have 5 songs , same iwth animals ,.... but i think i like it better when they have atleast 7-8 songs, it just seems like theres more to listen to... ,

__________________
"What do you mean, 'I hurt your feelings'?
I didn't know you had any feelings.
What do you mean, 'I ain't kind'?
Just not your kind.
What do you mean, 'I couldn't be the President
Of the United States of America'?
Tell me something, it's still 'We the people,' right?"

I agree with Botley, they are still very talented. I doubt Roger would work again with David, though. With Nick, yes of course, with Richard maybe, but with David... no way IMO.

And anyway, about the "average album" that someone mentioned, if average means "not at Dark side level", something like OBC, for example, hey, give me that "average album" NOW, please!!!

__________________
"Don't you know there ain't no devil, it's just god when he's drunk." Tom Waits

Aniamals is one of my favourites, and it's only 5 tracks.....it's actually longer than DSOTM (I think)...I wouldn't care if the new album would have 1 track....

__________________
Spellinng mistaces are a federale offence, yu wil be baned if you are kought makeing eny.

i agree , but i think it just seems longer if theres more , even if its not......... oh and i'm pretty sure its not , i think animals is i think aorund 45 minutes , and dsotm is i think around 55 , 56 minutes , but what ever........

__________________
"What do you mean, 'I hurt your feelings'?
I didn't know you had any feelings.
What do you mean, 'I ain't kind'?
Just not your kind.
What do you mean, 'I couldn't be the President
Of the United States of America'?
Tell me something, it's still 'We the people,' right?"