Science

No, the observer still wouldn't observe the object going faster than the speed of light.

If not, then explain why not. I've given you a perfectly rational arguement as to why this is true. This is not my own theory. Men far cleverer than you or I have worked on this.

Because of what Einstein has said, and no one has yet to prove him wrong

and just because the observer sees the oblect going faster than the speed of light doesn't mean that the object actually is. It takes infinite energy to go the speed of light, so how could you go over the speed of light?

That's exactly the point!!!!

The theory obeys all the laws of physics, and that's why it's possible. But the fact that the observer perceives it to be faster is important, because time is relative - at the limits of the laws of physics, nothing is absolute.

I sorry, but I just don't see how that will make you go back in time.

Here is an interesting link dealing with astronomy.

I saw this video where this guy puts a stack of mentos in a bottle of coke and a spring of coke shoots up 5 feet. It was pretty cool.

yeah I love those type of experiments

I think its pretty interesting that the the probe that NASA just sent to Pluto is powered by 24 pounds of Plutonium...it reminds me of "Family Guy," since Stewy loves to talk about Plutonium.

great minds think alike,,, a friggin cartoon character baby and NASA, what has this world come to

well that's one smart baby