![]() |
|
| Welcome to the All Pink Floyd Fan Network! |
| You are currently viewing our website as a guest. Guests receive only limited access to view most discussions and articles. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, dowload attachments, communicate privately with other floydians (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features, including the ability to disable the Pink Floyd store below, for faster navigating. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support. |
| Pink Floyd Store | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Well, after being banned from this forum for a long week (without warning) due to my use of the F word Once (directed ad Fixx) I hope that some changes can be made. This is what I want 1.- Before a user can be banned, at least one warning should be made 2.- At least 2 moderators should decide if the user should be banned. I am afraid some moderators can get carried away with their power. That is all. I just hope that bannings will be reserved for spammers and people who ignore warnings. At least "jesus" didn't ban me forever. If elected MODERATOR my first act will be to ban the whole lot of ya, and burn yourtown to cind.... etc etc etc.
__________________ Driving without insurance. Selling insurance. |
| Sponsored Links |
| |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed By the way, I apologize for using the F word. To those out there whom I have offended, I sincerely apologize. To you Fixx, I apologize.
__________________ Driving without insurance. Selling insurance. Last edited by iplaycheapstrat : 04-04-2006 at 10:51 PM. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Well you were soft banned, which is kind of like a time out, which I don't believe should require a warning. If a mod was looking to ban you permanently, it would have to be discussed and you would be warned for sure... If a mod is out to IP ban you, they have to take it up with Paulo and convince him it's the right thing to do, in which case your arguments will never stand. The only way to get around that is if somehow your IP resets itself randomly and allows you access to the site again. If it's real intense, then everywhere you go you will find that APFFN is inaccessible. Malls, libraries, and even your dad's office. Bans aren't often taken lightly, from what I know of the moderator ways (i've befreinded and be-enemied a few in my day) so quit bitching and behave.
__________________ One eyed, one horned |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Aye aye sir
__________________ Driving without insurance. Selling insurance. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Technically speaking - this thread itself is against policy. Not to mention in the wrong forum
__________________ - Simon, RN (BSN) [Drug Pusher: The "Official" Blog] Watch my videos |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Quote:
iplaycheapstrat, I accept your apology. You had been warned previously by DeathTöngue for your attitude towards other members in the last 6 months. After viewing your comments on the moderators in the 'how does one become a moderator' thread, it was apparent that you needed to take time out to think about things and coupled with your rather extreme response in the 'Floyd DVD' thread, I thought it best to let you go and cool off for a week. Although I didn't consult the other mods prior to 'soft banning' you, of the ones that I've talked to since then, it's been agreed that it was the right thing to do. And to allay your fears, banning ARE reserved for spammers and people that don't heed warnings. Mark
__________________ |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Well I am glad to hear that. End of story, Clean Slate for me. End of this thread for me. It's good to be back.
__________________ Driving without insurance. Selling insurance. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed If it were up to me, no one would be banned.
__________________ Nader/Gonzalez '08! We only need 55 million votes to make it happen! This is what I'm listening to right now! |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Quote:
As to soft bans without prior warning is better than being banned for ever.I thank all the mods/active members,especially Botley,Driven and Fixx for giving me a timeout and I really needed a break.See i was blanket banned;the premonitions and confirmed suspicions were all there for me to read and heed to the advice.But i failed to clean-up my PM folders hence couldnt read the warning.IMHO;a soft ban or a blanket ban is very useful indeed(though one suffers from initial shock...time heals)as it makes the "person-in-the-ban" look back upon all those mistakes,over the edge,useless,posting in triplicates,and other such acts which he/she enacted voluntary or involuntary.During the banned time (usually 7-15 days i think?)if the "soft-banned" comes to recognise the errors of the ways;and when the ban is over you can see things with more clarity.And if that person fails to understand the reason for the ban;and comes back quoting "Wasteland,no matter how good a person;will end up falling from grace"(ref:Marlon Brando's character in Apocalypso Now !). |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Indeed. I'll just scoot this over to the suggestion forum... the "consult with at least one other mod" would be in my list as well. Temporary banning has its place, but sometimes I wish this board would allow the use of flood control.
__________________ what do you teach your children about me? what do you teach your little children about me? pimp, thug, bling drug lord of the undergrounded kings how can you be so sure i won't call down the rain? what do you teach your little children about me? you point your gun, wait, hide and run. i see it plain |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Quote:
Dam, right?
__________________ |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Quote:
Was I just promoted to the heady heights of mod???
__________________ Only the very safe, Can talk about wrong and right. Of those that are forced to choose, There's some who will choose to fight. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed didn't you know? Congratulations Driven!
__________________ "The sound of music in my ears" “The great error of earlier ethics is that it conceived itself as concerned only with the relations of man to man." - Albert Schweitzer |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed I think this calls for some cake and booze.
__________________ That's all. APFFN Now you can see all the shit I listen to. And you can fawn over my Myspace. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed Quote:
I was going to say that, but you beat me to it...you eager beaver
__________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj7f3B1VCYM |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads for Banning Policy Needs to be reviewed | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pinkfloydfan.net reviewed | Jethro | Just babbling... | 11 | 09-04-2002 01:50 AM |